Arizona Chemical Ltd.
CIK 1489057Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Apr 2010 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.14 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kris F. HeinzelmanCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in a filing · 65 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Robert W. DownesSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in a filing · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kris F. HeinzelmanCravath Swaine & Moore | Apr 2010 | Named in a filing | 65 | 1.32 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| Robert W. DownesSullivan & Cromwell | Apr 2010 | Named in a filing | 58 | 1.62 | 0.82 | 0.51 |