ATOSSA THERAPEUTICS, INC. ATOS (last ticker on record)

CIK 1488039Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

95% wipeout
Restatement
Delisting notice (not a red flag)

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 2; Newest began Nov 2018
Largest fall in its shares: 99%; Mar 2013 to Jun 2026
Law firms: 10; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 7; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Feb 17, 2026Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Aug 21, 2025Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Feb 24, 2025Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 18, 2024Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Sep 28, 2023Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jul 13, 2023Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jun 23, 2023Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 4, 2023Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Oct 7, 2022Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Nov 13, 2018Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jun 2, 2017Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 11, 2017Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Nov 17, 2015Shares down 95% from their high
Oct 2, 2015Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP	Feb 2017	Named in SEC correspondence	963	0.96	1.12	1.21
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP	Jun 2015	Named in SEC correspondence	1,125	1.23	0.20	0.96
Ropes & Gray	Feb 2012	Named in SEC correspondence	914	0.98	0.14	0.92
Goodwin Procter	Oct 2010	Named in a filing	1,221	0.79	0.31	1.17
Dorsey & Whitney LLP	Oct 2012	Text search only	630	0.83	0.73	1.16
Davis Wright Tremaine LLP	Apr 2012	Text search only	130	0.97	0.59	1.27
Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP	Feb 2012	Text search only	97	0.86	1.08	0.92
Pryor Cashman	Feb 2012	Text search only	229	1.28	1.25	1.28
Shipman & Goodwin	Mar 2010	Text search only	54	1.25	0.82	1.18
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati	Mar 2010	Text search only	1,468	1.09	0.60	1.42

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Sean FellerGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP	Mar 2021	Named in a filing	43	1.91	0.00	0.72
Sarah WilliamsEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP	Apr 2018	Named in SEC correspondence	49	1.71	1.90	1.66
Lisa M. KahleRopes & Gray	Apr 2012	Named in SEC correspondence	6	0.00	0.00	0.92
Maggie L. WongGoodwin Procter	Oct 2010	Named in a filing	19	0.00	2.17	0.98
Ryan A. MurrGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP	Oct 2010	Named in SEC correspondence	77	0.53	0.77	0.66
David N. FeldmanFeldman Weinstein	Apr 2021	Text search only	145	0.47	0.48	1.16
Lee W. CassidyCassidy & Associates	Mar 2010	Text search only	184	0.24	0.77	0.24