Hawaiian Telcom Holdco, Inc. HCOM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1487986Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Nov 2010 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Cades SchutteFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Nov 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
| Morgan Lewis | Nov 2010 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Cades Schutte | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 21 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.93 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brett CooperOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Dec 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 0.84 | 2.34 | 0.81 |