Luokung Technology Corp. KONE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1487839Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2019
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jan 2019 to Jul 2025
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Jan 2025 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Venable LLPFirst linked Apr 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 506 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Jun 2018 · Named in a filing · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Harney Westwood & RiegelsFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in a filing · 238 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Pryor CashmanFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 229 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Han KunFirst linked Feb 2023 · Text search only · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maples and Calder | Jan 2025 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Venable LLP | Apr 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 506 | 0.79 | 0.38 | 0.73 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Jun 2018 | Named in a filing | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| Harney Westwood & Riegels | Apr 2010 | Named in a filing | 238 | 1.34 | 1.02 | 0.76 |
| Pryor Cashman | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 229 | 1.28 | 1.25 | 1.28 |
| Han Kun | Feb 2023 | Text search only | 178 | 1.08 | 0.35 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- William N. HaddadVenable LLPFirst linked Apr 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Elizabeth Fei ChenPryor CashmanFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 1.32× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William N. HaddadVenable LLP | Apr 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 1.71 | 0.41 | 1.36 |
| Elizabeth Fei ChenPryor Cashman | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 1.04 | 1.32 | 1.39 |