ECA Marcellus Trust I ECT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1487798Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- 97%
- Mar 2011 to Dec 2020
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Jun 2010 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Dec 2012 · Text search only · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- McGuire Craddock & StrotherFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.74×
- Goodwin & GoodwinFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.05× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr, P.C.First linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 1.71× · 95% wipeout 1.60×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Jun 2010 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Andrews Kurth LLP | Dec 2012 | Text search only | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.30 |
| McGuire Craddock & Strother | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 13 | 1.48 | 0.00 | 3.74 |
| Goodwin & Goodwin | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 12 | 0.00 | 1.05 | 1.47 |
| Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr, P.C. | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 24 | 1.61 | 1.71 | 1.60 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David P. OelmanVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 78 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Scott OlsonAndrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Dec 2012 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
- William C. McDonaldAndrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Dec 2012 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David P. OelmanVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 78 | 1.62 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| Scott OlsonAndrews Kurth LLP | Dec 2012 | Text search only | 19 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.65 |
| William C. McDonaldAndrews Kurth LLP | Dec 2012 | Text search only | 8 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 2.02 |