APT Motovox Group, Inc. MTVX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1486526Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 215 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Law Offices of Gary L. BlumFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.78× · Went dark 2.90× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Davis & AssociatesFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.89× · Went dark 2.52× · 95% wipeout 2.45×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richardson & Patel LLP | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 215 | 1.07 | 1.41 | 1.28 |
| Law Offices of Gary L. Blum | Aug 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 34 | 1.78 | 2.90 | 1.12 |
| Davis & Associates | Jun 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 1.89 | 2.52 | 2.45 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Peter HoganRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.87× · Went dark 1.30× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Gary BlumFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.74× · Went dark 1.14× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Gary L. BlumLaw Offices of Gary L. BlumFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.03× · Went dark 2.55× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Donald G. DavisDavis & AssociatesFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 1.26× · 95% wipeout 1.81×
- Christopher K. DaviesK&L GatesFirst linked Mar 2010 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 1.85× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter HoganRichardson & Patel LLP | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 36 | 1.87 | 1.30 | 1.41 |
| Gary Blum | Apr 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 1.74 | 1.14 | 1.21 |
| Gary L. BlumLaw Offices of Gary L. Blum | Aug 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 36 | 2.03 | 2.55 | 1.16 |
| Donald G. DavisDavis & Associates | Jan 2011 | Named in a filing | 26 | 1.64 | 1.26 | 1.81 |
| Christopher K. DaviesK&L Gates | Mar 2010 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.49 | 1.85 | 1.26 |