Charm Communications Inc.
CIK 1485487Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 14
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hachigian, LLPFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Gunderson DettmerFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 333 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Commerce & Finance Law OfficesFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in a filing · 157 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Jun 2014 · Text search only · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Heller EhrmanFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- King & WoodFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 172 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hachigian, LLP | Jun 2014 | Named in a filing | 7 | 2.66 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Jun 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Gunderson Dettmer | Nov 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 333 | 1.17 | 0.66 | 1.32 |
| Commerce & Finance Law Offices | Apr 2010 | Named in a filing | 157 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 1.02 |
| Maples and Calder | Apr 2010 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Jun 2014 | Text search only | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| Paul Hastings | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| DLA Piper | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Heller Ehrman | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 256 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.96 |
| K&L Gates | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| King & Wood | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 172 | 1.23 | 0.34 | 1.24 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
| Winston & Strawn | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Chris LinSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.55× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
- Steven LiuDLA PiperFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 1.51× · 95% wipeout 1.57×
- David LambConyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Jun 2014 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Chao Yang DistrictO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.57×
- Simon LukWinston & StrawnFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 1.09× · 95% wipeout 0.57×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris LinSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Apr 2010 | Named in a filing | 39 | 1.28 | 1.55 | 1.65 |
| Steven LiuDLA Piper | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.69 | 1.51 | 1.57 |
| David LambConyers Dill & Pearman | Jun 2014 | Text search only | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.79 |
| Chao Yang DistrictO Melveny & Myers LLP | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 14 | 1.30 | 0.00 | 0.57 |
| Simon LukWinston & Strawn | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 16 | 0.84 | 1.09 | 0.57 |