H World Group Ltd HTHT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1483994Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Jan 2023 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- JunHe LLPFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2013 · Named in a filing · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Mar 2010 · Named in a filing · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Mar 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Mar 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Patterson Belknap Webb & TylerFirst linked Mar 2010 · Text search only · 185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.51× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Mar 2010 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Guantao Law FirmFirst linked Mar 2010 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.90× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Jun He Law OfficesFirst linked Mar 2010 · Text search only · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Mar 2010 · Text search only · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Zhong Lun Law FirmFirst linked Mar 2010 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maples and Calder | Jan 2023 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| JunHe LLP | Sep 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 49 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.49 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Aug 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2013 | Named in a filing | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Mar 2010 | Named in a filing | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| Davis Polk | Mar 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Mar 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler | Mar 2010 | Text search only | 185 | 0.89 | 0.51 | 1.17 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Mar 2010 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Guantao Law Firm | Mar 2010 | Text search only | 22 | 1.90 | 1.03 | 0.98 |
| Jun He Law Offices | Mar 2010 | Text search only | 73 | 0.89 | 0.68 | 1.23 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Mar 2010 | Text search only | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Zhong Lun Law Firm | Mar 2010 | Text search only | 90 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Howard ZhangDavis PolkFirst linked Mar 2010 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Li HeDavis PolkFirst linked Mar 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Z. Julie GaoSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Mar 2010 · Text search only · 124 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Chao Yang DistrictO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Mar 2010 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.57×
- Chris LinSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Mar 2010 · Text search only · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.55× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Howard ZhangDavis Polk | Mar 2010 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.31 | 0.00 | 0.81 |
| Li HeDavis Polk | Mar 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 53 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.61 |
| Z. Julie GaoSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Mar 2010 | Text search only | 124 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Chao Yang DistrictO Melveny & Myers LLP | Mar 2010 | Text search only | 14 | 1.30 | 0.00 | 0.57 |
| Chris LinSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Mar 2010 | Text search only | 39 | 1.28 | 1.55 | 1.65 |