Redgate Media Group
CIK 1483403Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in a filing · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Patterson Belknap Webb & TylerFirst linked Mar 2010 · Text search only · 185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.51× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Commerce & Finance Law OfficesFirst linked Feb 2010 · Text search only · 157 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2010 · Text search only · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Jingtian & GongchengFirst linked Feb 2010 · Text search only · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Feb 2010 · Text search only · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- King & WoodFirst linked Feb 2010 · Text search only · 172 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Feb 2010 | Named in a filing | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.14 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Feb 2010 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
| Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler | Mar 2010 | Text search only | 185 | 0.89 | 0.51 | 1.13 |
| Commerce & Finance Law Offices | Feb 2010 | Text search only | 157 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.98 |
| DLA Piper | Feb 2010 | Text search only | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
| Jingtian & Gongcheng | Feb 2010 | Text search only | 154 | 1.10 | 0.63 | 1.14 |
| K&L Gates | Feb 2010 | Text search only | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.20 |
| King & Wood | Feb 2010 | Text search only | 172 | 1.23 | 0.34 | 1.23 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Chun WeiSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Michael G. DeSombreSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Feb 2010 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- William Y. ChuaSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Feb 2010 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chun WeiSullivan & Cromwell | Feb 2010 | Named in a filing | 16 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Michael G. DeSombreSullivan & Cromwell | Feb 2010 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| William Y. ChuaSullivan & Cromwell | Feb 2010 | Text search only | 18 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 1.55 |