CELLULAR DYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL, INC. ICEL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1482080Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked May 2015 · Named in a filing · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in a filing · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Michael Best & FriedrichFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 65 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Quarles & BradyFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morrison & Foerster | May 2015 | Named in a filing | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Sidley Austin | Apr 2015 | Named in a filing | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Perkins Coie | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Foley & Lardner | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| Michael Best & Friedrich | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 65 | 1.51 | 0.48 | 0.61 |
| Quarles & Brady | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 170 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.79 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Arthur D. RobinsonSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Gregory J. LynchMichael Best & FriedrichFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.80× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
- Lesley PengSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arthur D. RobinsonSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 24 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| Gregory J. LynchMichael Best & Friedrich | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 9 | 0.00 | 2.80 | 0.55 |
| Lesley PengSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 13 | 0.52 | 0.00 | 1.55 |