Ra Pharmaceuticals, Inc. RARX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1481512Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Apr 2020 · Named in a filing · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Aug 2016 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Goulston & StorrsFirst linked Aug 2016 · Text search only · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covington & Burling | Apr 2020 | Named in a filing | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| Goodwin Procter | Aug 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2016 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| DLA Piper | Aug 2016 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Goulston & Storrs | Aug 2016 | Text search only | 86 | 0.90 | 0.34 | 1.33 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wesley C. HolmesLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2019 · Named in a filing · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 1.08× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Robert E. PuopoloGoodwin ProcterFirst linked May 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Peter N. HandrinosLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in a filing · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Ryan SansomCooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Kingsley L. TaftGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2016 · Text search only · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wesley C. HolmesLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2019 | Named in a filing | 53 | 1.55 | 1.08 | 1.36 |
| Robert E. PuopoloGoodwin Procter | May 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| Peter N. HandrinosLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2016 | Named in a filing | 85 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 1.34 |
| Ryan SansomCooley LLP | Aug 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.93 |
| Kingsley L. TaftGoodwin Procter | Aug 2016 | Text search only | 43 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 1.47 |