Performance Shipping Inc. PSHG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1481241Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jul 2017
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jun 2017 to Aug 2018
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Watson Farley & WilliamsFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 93 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Seward & KisselFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 164 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Apr 2021 · Text search only · 964 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.First linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 163 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Watson Farley & Williams | Mar 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 93 | 0.59 | 0.32 | 1.32 |
| Seward & Kissel | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 164 | 0.78 | 0.19 | 1.31 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Apr 2021 | Text search only | 964 | 0.95 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Cozen O'Connor P.C. | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 163 | 1.03 | 0.63 | 0.98 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Todd JohnsonWatson Farley & WilliamsFirst linked Feb 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark — · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Will VogelWatson Farley & WilliamsFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- Edward S. HortonSeward & KisselFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.97×
- Gary J. WolfeSeward & KisselFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.67×
- Robert E. LustrinSeward & KisselFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 2.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd JohnsonWatson Farley & Williams | Feb 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | — | 0.91 |
| Will VogelWatson Farley & Williams | Mar 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.73 |
| Edward S. HortonSeward & Kissel | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 1.97 |
| Gary J. WolfeSeward & Kissel | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 47 | 1.08 | 0.00 | 2.67 |
| Robert E. LustrinSeward & Kissel | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 40 | 1.29 | 0.55 | 2.91 |