United States Commodity Index Funds Trust CPER (last ticker on record)
CIK 1479247Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLPFirst linked Mar 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Apr 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Jul 2010 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Sutherland Asbill & BrennanFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP | Mar 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 55 | 1.70 | 0.63 | 0.63 |
| Reed Smith | Apr 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Jul 2010 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Sutherland Asbill & Brennan | Dec 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 130 | 0.94 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Owen J. PinkertonEversheds Sutherland (US) LLPFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- W. Thomas ConnerReed SmithFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Thomas ConnerSutherland Asbill & BrennanFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Owen J. PinkertonEversheds Sutherland (US) LLP | Nov 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 2.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| W. Thomas ConnerReed Smith | Dec 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 2.40 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Thomas ConnerSutherland Asbill & Brennan | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 6 | 3.54 | 0.00 | 0.00 |