STAG Industrial, Inc. STAG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1479094Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Feb 2019 · Named in a filing · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked May 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in a filing · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Goulston & StorrsFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Nutter McClennen & FishFirst linked Sep 2010 · Text search only · 88 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP | Feb 2019 | Named in a filing | 161 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Hunton & Williams | May 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Paul Hastings | Sep 2010 | Named in a filing | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| DLA Piper | Jul 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Goulston & Storrs | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 86 | 0.90 | 0.34 | 1.33 |
| Nutter McClennen & Fish | Sep 2010 | Text search only | 88 | 0.75 | 0.47 | 0.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Anna K. SpenceDLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.14× · Went dark — · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Kerry E. JohnsonDLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- John L. SullivanVenable LLPFirst linked Sep 2010 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 2.24× · 95% wipeout 3.47×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna K. SpenceDLA Piper | Feb 2022 | Named in a filing | 7 | 2.14 | — | 1.18 |
| Kerry E. JohnsonDLA Piper | Feb 2016 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.77 |
| John L. SullivanVenable LLP | Sep 2010 | Text search only | 12 | 0.73 | 2.24 | 3.47 |