CONTRAFECT Corp CFRX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1478069Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Dec 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Dec 2015 to Mar 2024
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Oct 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2020 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Jul 2014 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Hyman Phelps & McNamaraFirst linked Jul 2014 · Text search only · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Oct 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Goodwin Procter | Aug 2020 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Cooley LLP | Jul 2014 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Hyman Phelps & McNamara | Jul 2014 | Text search only | 105 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jennifer A. YoonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Wesley C. HolmesLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 1.08× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Gregory P. RodgersLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Peter N. HandrinosLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Christopher M. ForresterShearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Jonathan DeSantisShearman & SterlingFirst linked Oct 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Seo SalimiGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2020 · Text search only · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Glen Y. SatoCooley LLPFirst linked Jul 2014 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.66×
- John J. Cannon IIIShearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2014 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jennifer A. YoonLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.21 |
| Wesley C. HolmesLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 53 | 1.55 | 1.08 | 1.36 |
| Gregory P. RodgersLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 44 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 1.44 |
| Peter N. HandrinosLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 85 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 1.34 |
| Christopher M. ForresterShearman & Sterling | Jul 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 1.33 |
| Jonathan DeSantisShearman & Sterling | Oct 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.04 |
| Seo SalimiGoodwin Procter | Aug 2020 | Text search only | 56 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 1.21 |
| Glen Y. SatoCooley LLP | Jul 2014 | Text search only | 17 | 1.50 | 0.00 | 1.66 |
| John J. Cannon IIIShearman & Sterling | Jul 2014 | Text search only | 22 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 1.30 |