Fairmount Bancorp, Inc. FMTB (last ticker on record)
CIK 1477968Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Elias, Matz, Tiernan & Herrick L.L.P.First linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 147 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.44×
- Luse Gorman, PCFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 301 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.22×
- Jones WalkerFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in a filing · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.23× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Kilpatrick StocktonFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in a filing · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elias, Matz, Tiernan & Herrick L.L.P. | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 147 | 0.62 | 0.38 | 0.44 |
| Luse Gorman, PC | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 301 | 0.58 | 0.06 | 0.22 |
| Jones Walker | Dec 2009 | Named in a filing | 161 | 1.34 | 0.23 | 0.91 |
| Kilpatrick Stockton | Dec 2009 | Named in a filing | 191 | 0.88 | 0.37 | 0.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Edward B. Crosland Jr.Jones WalkerFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert I. LipsherLuse Gorman, PCFirst linked Aug 2011 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- Lori M. BeresfordKilpatrick TownsendFirst linked Feb 2010 · Text search only · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edward B. Crosland Jr.Jones Walker | Dec 2009 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert I. LipsherLuse Gorman, PC | Aug 2011 | Text search only | 33 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| Lori M. BeresfordKilpatrick Townsend | Feb 2010 | Text search only | 23 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |