Omthera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. OMTH (last ticker on record)
CIK 1477598Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in a filing · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Dechert LLPFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 434 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- McInnes CooperFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Jul 2013 | Named in a filing | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Goodwin Procter | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Dechert LLP | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 434 | 0.84 | 0.41 | 0.96 |
| McInnes Cooper | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 34 | 1.14 | 0.48 | 1.14 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul R. KingsleyJones WalkerFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Edward A. KingGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Gregory P. RodgersLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Kingsley L. TaftGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jan 2013 · Text search only · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul R. KingsleyJones Walker | Jul 2013 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.49 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Edward A. KingGoodwin Procter | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 1.36 |
| Gregory P. RodgersLatham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 44 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 1.44 |
| Kingsley L. TaftGoodwin Procter | Jan 2013 | Text search only | 43 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 1.47 |