Scorpius Holdings, Inc. SCPX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1476963Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jan 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Apr 2024 to Sep 2025
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Blank RomeFirst linked Oct 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Gracin & Marlow, LLPFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 2.34× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Duane MorrisFirst linked Apr 2020 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Zysman Aharoni GayerFirst linked Mar 2018 · Text search only · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Mar 2016 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Hyman Phelps & McNamaraFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Alston & BirdFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank Rome | Oct 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| Gracin & Marlow, LLP | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 55 | 0.97 | 2.34 | 1.38 |
| Duane Morris | Apr 2020 | Text search only | 413 | 0.76 | 1.28 | 1.06 |
| Zysman Aharoni Gayer | Mar 2018 | Text search only | 42 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 1.40 |
| Morgan Lewis | Mar 2016 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Hyman Phelps & McNamara | May 2013 | Text search only | 105 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 1.08 |
| Alston & Bird | May 2013 | Text search only | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.79 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Melissa Palat MurawskyBlank RomeFirst linked Dec 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Patrick J. EganGracin & Marlow, LLPFirst linked Mar 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 1.84× · 95% wipeout 1.89×
- Leslie MarlowBlank RomeFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 71 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 2.60× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Hank GracinGracin & Marlow, LLPFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 2.28× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
- Yvan-Claude PierreReed SmithFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.96× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 2.33×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melissa Palat MurawskyBlank Rome | Dec 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 2.06 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Patrick J. EganGracin & Marlow, LLP | Mar 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 0.40 | 1.84 | 1.89 |
| Leslie MarlowBlank Rome | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 71 | 0.58 | 2.60 | 1.43 |
| Hank GracinGracin & Marlow, LLP | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 77 | 0.66 | 2.28 | 1.53 |
| Yvan-Claude PierreReed Smith | May 2013 | Text search only | 30 | 1.96 | 1.66 | 2.33 |