Crumbs Bake Shop, Inc. CRMB (last ticker on record)
CIK 1476719Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jul 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gordon Feinblatt Rothman Hoffberger & HollanderFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.42× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Feb 2011 · Text search only · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Nov 2009 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Nov 2009 · Text search only · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gordon Feinblatt Rothman Hoffberger & Hollander | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.42 | 0.56 | 0.80 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Akin Gump | Feb 2011 | Text search only | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Morgan Lewis | Nov 2009 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Willkie Farr | Nov 2009 | Text search only | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew BulginGordon Feinblatt Rothman Hoffberger & HollanderFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Kathleen L. CervenyEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jul 2011 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 3.30× · 95% wipeout 2.28×
- Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 338 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 416 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- John D. HogoboomLowenstein SandlerFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 1.07× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Bruce S. MendelsohnAkin GumpFirst linked Feb 2011 · Text search only · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew BulginGordon Feinblatt Rothman Hoffberger & Hollander | Nov 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Kathleen L. CervenyEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jul 2011 | Named in a filing | 17 | 0.51 | 3.30 | 2.28 |
| Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 338 | 0.95 | 0.66 | 0.95 |
| Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 416 | 0.78 | 0.42 | 1.04 |
| John D. HogoboomLowenstein Sandler | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 49 | 0.59 | 1.07 | 1.17 |
| Bruce S. MendelsohnAkin Gump | Feb 2011 | Text search only | 47 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.51 |