Terreno Realty Corp TRNO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1476150Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Aug 2025 · Named in a filing · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Ettore A. SantucciFirst linked Nov 2009 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Hastings | Aug 2025 | Named in a filing | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Goodwin Procter | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Ettore A. Santucci | Nov 2009 | Text search only | 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Caitlin R. TompkinsGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2024 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark — · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Scott C. ChaseGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Alison S. ResslerSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Suzanne D. LecarozGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Gilbert G. MennaGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Patrick S. BrownSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caitlin R. TompkinsGoodwin Procter | Feb 2024 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 |
| Scott C. ChaseGoodwin Procter | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 1.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Alison S. ResslerSullivan & Cromwell | Dec 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 1.84 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Suzanne D. LecarozGoodwin Procter | Dec 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Gilbert G. MennaGoodwin Procter | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Patrick S. BrownSullivan & Cromwell | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 1.18 |