Chatham Lodging Trust CLDT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1476045Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Dec 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Venable LLPFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in a filing · 506 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Arent FoxFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.94× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP | Dec 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 161 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| Venable LLP | Dec 2009 | Named in a filing | 506 | 0.78 | 0.38 | 0.71 |
| Hunton & Williams | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Arent Fox | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 90 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mark W. WickershamHunton Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Dec 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Christopher C. GreenHunton & WilliamsFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Amos W. BarclayHolland & HartFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- David C. WrightHunton & WilliamsFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.23×
- Julian T. H. KleindorferLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark W. WickershamHunton Andrews Kurth LLP | Dec 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Christopher C. GreenHunton & Williams | Jan 2014 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.56 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Amos W. BarclayHolland & Hart | Feb 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| David C. WrightHunton & Williams | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 0.23 |
| Julian T. H. KleindorferLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 |