National Bank Holdings Corp NBHC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1475841Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jul 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLPFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in a filing · 97 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Nov 2011 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Nov 2011 · Text search only · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Nelson MullinsFirst linked Nov 2011 · Text search only · 301 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Stinson Morrison HeckerFirst linked Nov 2011 · Text search only · 93 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP | Sep 2022 | Named in a filing | 97 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Nov 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| DLA Piper | Nov 2011 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Nov 2011 | Text search only | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Nelson Mullins | Nov 2011 | Text search only | 301 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.88 |
| Stinson Morrison Hecker | Nov 2011 | Text search only | 93 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- James J. BarresiSquire Patton Boggs (US) LLPFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Mark F. VeblenWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked May 2014 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- David E. ShapiroWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- Jonathan H. TalcottNelson MullinsFirst linked Nov 2011 · Text search only · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James J. BarresiSquire Patton Boggs (US) LLP | Sep 2022 | Named in a filing | 25 | 0.30 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Mark F. VeblenWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | May 2014 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.98 |
| David E. ShapiroWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Nov 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 56 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| Jonathan H. TalcottNelson Mullins | Nov 2011 | Text search only | 38 | 0.31 | 0.00 | 0.61 |