SOUPMAN, INC. SOUP (last ticker on record)
CIK 1475273Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Apr 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gracin & Marlow, LLPFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 2.34× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Clark Wilson LLPFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 204 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 1.43× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gracin & Marlow, LLP | Feb 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 55 | 0.97 | 2.34 | 1.38 |
| Clark Wilson LLP | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 204 | 0.72 | 1.43 | 1.11 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hank GracinGracin & Marlow, LLPFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 2.28× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
- Angela M. BlakeClark Wilson LLPFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 3.10× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Bernard PinskyClark Wilson LLPFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 1.54× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Conrad Y. NestO'Neill LawFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 1.72× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Ethan P. MinskyClark Wilson LLPFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 1.89× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Jonathan C. LotzClark Wilson LLPFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 2.12× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Jun Ho SongClark Wilson LLPFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 2.31× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Kari RichardsonClark Wilson LLPFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 1.87× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Vikram DhirClark Wilson LLPFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 2.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Virgil Z. HlusClark Wilson LLPFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 1.95× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hank GracinGracin & Marlow, LLP | Feb 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 77 | 0.66 | 2.28 | 1.53 |
| Angela M. BlakeClark Wilson LLP | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 18 | 0.95 | 3.10 | 1.12 |
| Bernard PinskyClark Wilson LLP | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 56 | 0.47 | 1.54 | 0.89 |
| Conrad Y. NestO'Neill Law | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 39 | 0.66 | 1.72 | 1.31 |
| Ethan P. MinskyClark Wilson LLP | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 44 | 0.38 | 1.89 | 0.96 |
| Jonathan C. LotzClark Wilson LLP | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 30 | 0.57 | 2.12 | 0.82 |
| Jun Ho SongClark Wilson LLP | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 28 | 1.04 | 2.31 | 1.19 |
| Kari RichardsonClark Wilson LLP | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 37 | 0.46 | 1.87 | 1.27 |
| Vikram DhirClark Wilson LLP | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 38 | 0.66 | 2.27 | 0.91 |
| Virgil Z. HlusClark Wilson LLP | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 67 | 0.53 | 1.95 | 1.13 |