Tungsten Corp. TUNG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1475065Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jun 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- May 2013 to Dec 2014
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Aug 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Gersten Savage LLPFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 137 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Fox Rothschild LLPFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Hodgson RussFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.91× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Thomas E. Puzzo, PLLCFirst linked Apr 2012 · Text search only · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 2.30× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenberg Traurig | Aug 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Gersten Savage LLP | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 137 | 1.20 | 1.38 | 1.22 |
| Fox Rothschild LLP | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 149 | 0.92 | 1.38 | 0.90 |
| Hodgson Russ | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 85 | 1.15 | 0.91 | 1.39 |
| Thomas E. Puzzo, PLLC | Apr 2012 | Text search only | 115 | 1.61 | 2.30 | 0.89 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sung KimGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 6.24× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Mark C. LeeGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Aug 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 3.20× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
- David E. DanovitchSullivan & Worcester LLPFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 1.89× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Thomas E. PuzzoThomas E. Puzzo, PLLCFirst linked Apr 2012 · Text search only · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 2.35× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sung KimGreenberg Traurig | Apr 2014 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.24 | 6.24 | 1.34 |
| Mark C. LeeGreenberg Traurig | Aug 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 44 | 0.70 | 3.20 | 1.75 |
| David E. DanovitchSullivan & Worcester LLP | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 85 | 0.88 | 1.89 | 1.25 |
| Thomas E. PuzzoThomas E. Puzzo, PLLC | Apr 2012 | Text search only | 115 | 1.70 | 2.35 | 0.92 |