BGSF, INC. BGSF (last ticker on record)
CIK 1474903Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Norton RoseFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked May 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSONFirst linked Oct 2013 · Text search only · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Dykema GossettFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.23× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Edwards Wildman PalmerFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Stevens & LeeFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 127 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norton Rose | Jul 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 304 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.24 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | May 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
| ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON | Oct 2013 | Text search only | 58 | 1.13 | 0.57 | 1.27 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Dykema Gossett | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 115 | 0.95 | 0.23 | 0.87 |
| Edwards Wildman Palmer | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 54 | 0.88 | 0.43 | 0.80 |
| Stevens & Lee | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 127 | 1.08 | 0.74 | 0.59 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brandon T. ByrneNorton RoseFirst linked Dec 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
- Glen J. HettingerFulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.41×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandon T. ByrneNorton Rose | Dec 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.55 |
| Glen J. HettingerFulbright & Jaworski | Dec 2013 | Named in a filing | 15 | 2.26 | 0.00 | 2.41 |