Cosmos Health Inc. COSM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1474167Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jan 2018 to Nov 2022
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Carmel, Milazzo & Feil LLPFirst linked May 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 4.10× · 95% wipeout 1.84×
- Davidoff Hutcher & Citron LLPFirst linked Dec 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.04× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 2.12×
- Williams Law GroupFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 1.82× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ballard Spahr | Sep 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Carmel, Milazzo & Feil LLP | May 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 52 | 1.41 | 4.10 | 1.84 |
| Davidoff Hutcher & Citron LLP | Dec 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 2.04 | 0.86 | 2.12 |
| Williams Law Group | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 76 | 0.77 | 1.82 | 1.30 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mark GoldenbergDavidoff Hutcher & Citron LLPFirst linked Sep 2025 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Ross D. CarmelSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked May 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 108 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 2.40× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Elliot H. LutzkerDavidoff Hutcher & Citron LLPFirst linked Sep 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 1.87× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Michael T. WilliamsWilliams Law GroupFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 88 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 1.50× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark GoldenbergDavidoff Hutcher & Citron LLP | Sep 2025 | Named in a filing | 7 | 3.16 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| Ross D. CarmelSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | May 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 108 | 1.01 | 2.40 | 1.33 |
| Elliot H. LutzkerDavidoff Hutcher & Citron LLP | Sep 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 1.67 | 1.87 | 1.23 |
| Michael T. WilliamsWilliams Law Group | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 88 | 0.55 | 1.50 | 1.08 |