Baltic Trading Ltd BALT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1474042Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in a filing · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Kramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Reeder & SimpsonFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in a filing · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Nov 2009 · Text search only · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Nov 2009 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Seward & KisselFirst linked Oct 2009 · Text search only · 164 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Jun 2015 | Named in a filing | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
| Kramer Levin Naftalis | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 304 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.16 |
| Reeder & Simpson | Oct 2009 | Named in a filing | 47 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 1.49 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Nov 2009 | Text search only | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Nov 2009 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Seward & Kissel | Oct 2009 | Text search only | 164 | 0.78 | 0.19 | 1.28 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dennis J. ReederReeder & SimpsonFirst linked Mar 2010 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
- Thomas E. MolnerKramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 2.18× · 95% wipeout 6.30×
- Stephen P. FarrellMorgan LewisFirst linked Oct 2009 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dennis J. ReederReeder & Simpson | Mar 2010 | Named in a filing | 30 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 1.74 |
| Thomas E. MolnerKramer Levin Naftalis | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.62 | 2.18 | 6.30 |
| Stephen P. FarrellMorgan Lewis | Oct 2009 | Text search only | 20 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 0.00 |