Resaca Exploitation, Inc. RSOX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1473332Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in a filing · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Jan 2010 · Text search only · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Shannon, Gracey, Ratliff & Miller, L.L.P.First linked Jan 2010 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Bracewell LLPFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 247 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Oct 2009 · Text search only · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Oct 2009 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haynes and Boone | Oct 2009 | Named in a filing | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.86 |
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Jan 2010 | Text search only | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 1.01 |
| Shannon, Gracey, Ratliff & Miller, L.L.P. | Jan 2010 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Bracewell LLP | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 247 | 0.93 | 0.31 | 0.96 |
| Hunton & Williams | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| King & Spalding | Oct 2009 | Text search only | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.01 |
| Mayer Brown | Oct 2009 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David S. HuntFirst linked Jan 2010 · Text search only · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 1.61× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Bruce NewsomeHaynes and BooneFirst linked Jan 2010 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Phillip A. WylieFirst linked Oct 2009 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 4.34× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David S. Hunt | Jan 2010 | Text search only | 29 | 0.97 | 1.61 | 1.36 |
| Bruce NewsomeHaynes and Boone | Jan 2010 | Text search only | 18 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Phillip A. Wylie | Oct 2009 | Text search only | 7 | 4.34 | 1.28 | 1.36 |