CALERES INC CAL (last ticker on record)
CIK 14707Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began May 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Oct 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2011 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.First linked Jul 2011 · Text search only · 163 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- McMillan LLPFirst linked Jul 2011 · Text search only · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.73× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Lang Michener LLPFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- WolfBlock LLPFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 84 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 1.36× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bryan Cave | Oct 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jul 2011 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Cozen O'Connor P.C. | Jul 2011 | Text search only | 163 | 1.03 | 0.63 | 0.94 |
| McMillan LLP | Jul 2011 | Text search only | 95 | 1.06 | 1.73 | 0.92 |
| Lang Michener LLP | May 2005 | Text search only | 90 | 1.14 | 1.17 | 1.01 |
| WolfBlock LLP | May 2005 | Text search only | 84 | 0.84 | 1.36 | 1.04 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian K. FeezelBryan CaveFirst linked Jan 2016 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- R. Randall WangBryan CaveFirst linked Dec 2007 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Robert J. EndicottBryan CaveFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- James L. Nouss Jr.Bryan CaveFirst linked Oct 1996 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian K. FeezelBryan Cave | Jan 2016 | Named in a filing | 9 | 2.70 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| R. Randall WangBryan Cave | Dec 2007 | Named in a filing | 28 | 1.34 | 0.00 | 1.14 |
| Robert J. EndicottBryan Cave | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 1.48 |
| James L. Nouss Jr.Bryan Cave | Oct 1996 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.07 | 0.00 | 1.29 |