Towers Watson & Co. TW (last ticker on record)
CIK 1470215Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in a filing · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Gibson Dunn & CrutcherFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,126 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Jul 2010 · Text search only · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Oct 2009 · Text search only · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Drinker Biddle & ReathFirst linked Sep 2009 · Text search only · 213 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Sep 2009 | Named in a filing | 305 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 0.95 |
| Gibson Dunn & Crutcher | Sep 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,126 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.95 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Sep 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 439 | 1.01 | 0.35 | 0.70 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Jul 2010 | Text search only | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.06 |
| Davis Polk | Oct 2009 | Text search only | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Drinker Biddle & Reath | Sep 2009 | Text search only | 213 | 1.46 | 0.77 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew L. FabensGibson Dunn & CrutcherFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in a filing · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Brian LaneGibson Dunn & CrutcherFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in a filing · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Charles J. ConroyMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Stephen I. GloverGibson Dunn & CrutcherFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew L. FabensGibson Dunn & Crutcher | Jul 2010 | Named in a filing | 85 | 1.47 | 0.00 | 1.34 |
| Brian LaneGibson Dunn & Crutcher | Jul 2010 | Named in a filing | 52 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Charles J. ConroyMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Sep 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 0.65 |
| Stephen I. GloverGibson Dunn & Crutcher | Sep 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 1.56 | 1.39 | 0.85 |