Shanda Games Ltd
CIK 1470157Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked May 2015 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked May 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in a filing · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- King & WoodFirst linked Oct 2015 · Text search only · 172 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Dacheng Law OfficesFirst linked May 2015 · Text search only · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- JunZeJun Law OfficesFirst linked May 2015 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.78×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2015 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2015 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Allen & GledhillFirst linked Sep 2009 · Text search only · 64 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Commerce & Finance Law OfficesFirst linked Sep 2009 · Text search only · 157 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Ziegler Ziegler & AssociatesFirst linked Sep 2009 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Bae Kim & LeeFirst linked Sep 2009 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.44×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sullivan & Cromwell | May 2015 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | May 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Sep 2009 | Named in a filing | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| Davis Polk | Sep 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| King & Wood | Oct 2015 | Text search only | 172 | 1.23 | 0.34 | 1.24 |
| Dacheng Law Offices | May 2015 | Text search only | 50 | 1.71 | 0.69 | 1.09 |
| JunZeJun Law Offices | May 2015 | Text search only | 6 | 1.72 | 0.00 | 1.78 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | May 2015 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2015 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Allen & Gledhill | Sep 2009 | Text search only | 64 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Commerce & Finance Law Offices | Sep 2009 | Text search only | 157 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 1.02 |
| Ziegler Ziegler & Associates | Sep 2009 | Text search only | 37 | 0.92 | 0.62 | 0.97 |
| Bae Kim & Lee | Sep 2009 | Text search only | 14 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 0.44 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Chun WeiSullivan & CromwellFirst linked May 2015 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert ChuSullivan & CromwellFirst linked May 2015 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- James C. LinDavis PolkFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chun WeiSullivan & Cromwell | May 2015 | Named in a filing | 16 | 1.44 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert ChuSullivan & Cromwell | May 2015 | Named in a filing | 7 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| James C. LinDavis Polk | Sep 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 76 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.97 |