MSG NETWORKS INC. MSGN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1469372Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Schiff HardinFirst linked Jan 2010 · Named in a filing · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Jan 2010 · Text search only · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Patterson Belknap Webb & TylerFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.51× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Oct 2009 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schiff Hardin | Jan 2010 | Named in a filing | 184 | 0.78 | 0.85 | 1.26 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Aug 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Jan 2010 | Text search only | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 1.04 |
| Davis Polk | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 185 | 0.89 | 0.51 | 1.17 |
| Proskauer Rose | Oct 2009 | Text search only | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robert W. DownesSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Aug 2019 · Named in a filing · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- JOHN P. MEADSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.63× · Went dark 3.38× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- John F. KennedyFirst linked Aug 2009 · Text search only · 190 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- John L. SullivanVenable LLPFirst linked Aug 2009 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 2.24× · 95% wipeout 3.47×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert W. DownesSullivan & Cromwell | Aug 2019 | Named in a filing | 58 | 1.62 | 0.82 | 0.52 |
| JOHN P. MEADSullivan & Cromwell | Aug 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 2.63 | 3.38 | 0.00 |
| John F. Kennedy | Aug 2009 | Text search only | 190 | 1.52 | 0.60 | 1.17 |
| John L. SullivanVenable LLP | Aug 2009 | Text search only | 12 | 0.73 | 2.24 | 3.47 |