CHINA METRO-RURAL HOLDINGS Ltd CNA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1468944Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Reed SmithFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in a filing · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reed Smith | Nov 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.12 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Feb 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 500 | 1.10 | 0.61 | 1.06 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Jul 2009 | Named in a filing | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.14 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richard V. SmithOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Gerard S. DiFioreReed SmithFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.30× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Brett CooperOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 2.35× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard V. SmithOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Jun 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Gerard S. DiFioreReed Smith | Nov 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 1.30 | 0.99 |
| Brett CooperOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Feb 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 0.84 | 2.35 | 1.05 |