Addus HomeCare Corp ADUS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1468328Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Nixon PeabodyFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 196 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Vedder PriceFirst linked Oct 2009 · Text search only · 144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Jul 2009 · Text search only · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Jul 2009 · Text search only · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- White & CaseFirst linked Jul 2009 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nixon Peabody | Jul 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 196 | 1.13 | 0.78 | 0.90 |
| Winston & Strawn | Jul 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| Vedder Price | Oct 2009 | Text search only | 144 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.94 |
| Foley & Lardner | Jul 2009 | Text search only | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| King & Spalding | Jul 2009 | Text search only | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| White & Case | Jul 2009 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Colin J. DiamondWhite & CaseFirst linked Jul 2009 · Text search only · 83 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Dominick P. DeChiaraWinston & StrawnFirst linked Jul 2009 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Lloyd H. SpencerNixon PeabodyFirst linked Jul 2009 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Patrick G. QuickFoley & LardnerFirst linked Jul 2009 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colin J. DiamondWhite & Case | Jul 2009 | Text search only | 83 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| Dominick P. DeChiaraWinston & Strawn | Jul 2009 | Text search only | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.21 |
| Lloyd H. SpencerNixon Peabody | Jul 2009 | Text search only | 16 | 0.00 | 0.85 | 1.47 |
| Patrick G. QuickFoley & Lardner | Jul 2009 | Text search only | 21 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 0.87 |