Deyu Agriculture Corp. DEYU (last ticker on record)
CIK 1467746Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Burton, Bartlett & GlogovacFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 1.58× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in a filing · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 375 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 1.40× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Sep 2010 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Saul EwingFirst linked Sep 2010 · Text search only · 100 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burton, Bartlett & Glogovac | Nov 2010 | Named in a filing | 23 | 0.35 | 1.58 | 1.02 |
| K&L Gates | Nov 2010 | Named in a filing | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Jun 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 375 | 1.17 | 1.40 | 0.93 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Sep 2010 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Saul Ewing | Sep 2010 | Text search only | 100 | 1.22 | 1.01 | 1.14 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Matthew OgurickK&L GatesFirst linked May 2012 · Named in a filing · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Clayton E. ParkerK&L GatesFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in a filing · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.96× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Eric M. SteinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.85× · 95% wipeout 1.45×
- Diane D. DalmyFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 89 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.70× · Went dark 1.91× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew OgurickK&L Gates | May 2012 | Named in a filing | 50 | 0.63 | 1.33 | 1.25 |
| Clayton E. ParkerK&L Gates | Nov 2010 | Named in a filing | 129 | 1.18 | 1.96 | 1.28 |
| Eric M. SteinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Jul 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 60 | 1.01 | 1.85 | 1.45 |
| Diane D. Dalmy | Jul 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 89 | 2.70 | 1.91 | 0.50 |