NVN Liquidation, Inc. NOVN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1467154Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Jul 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Dec 2016 to Sep 2023
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Smith AndersonFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Aug 2016 · Text search only · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | Feb 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Smith Anderson | Feb 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 67 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 1.41 |
| K&L Gates | Aug 2016 | Text search only | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gerald F. RoachSmith AndersonFirst linked Oct 2017 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.79×
- Amy M. BattenSmith AndersonFirst linked Aug 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.22×
- Brent B. SilerCooley LLPFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- Charles K. RuckLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 74 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Wesley C. HolmesLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 1.08× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gerald F. RoachSmith Anderson | Oct 2017 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 1.79 |
| Amy M. BattenSmith Anderson | Aug 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 3.22 |
| Brent B. SilerCooley LLP | Feb 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 51 | 0.40 | 0.57 | 1.70 |
| Charles K. RuckLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 74 | 1.30 | 0.35 | 0.69 |
| Wesley C. HolmesLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 53 | 1.55 | 1.08 | 1.36 |