CreXus Investment Corp. CXS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1467027Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Jun 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- McKee Nelson LLPFirst linked Jun 2009 · Text search only · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.20×
- Preston Gates & EllisFirst linked Jun 2009 · Text search only · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Jun 2009 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| K&L Gates | Jun 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| McKee Nelson LLP | Jun 2009 | Text search only | 53 | 0.88 | 0.37 | 0.20 |
| Preston Gates & Ellis | Jun 2009 | Text search only | 159 | 1.36 | 1.62 | 1.44 |
| Sidley Austin | Jun 2009 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David W. BernsteinClifford Chance US LLPFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.36×
- Gilbert G. MennaGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- John T. HaggertyGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Paul D. TroppRopes & GrayFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 108 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Valerie Ford JacobFreshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLPFirst linked Jun 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David W. BernsteinClifford Chance US LLP | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.52 | 0.00 | 2.36 |
| Gilbert G. MennaGoodwin Procter | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| John T. HaggertyGoodwin Procter | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| Paul D. TroppRopes & Gray | Jul 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 108 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| Valerie Ford JacobFreshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP | Jun 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 45 | 1.30 | 0.00 | 1.38 |