VANTAGE DRILLING INTERNATIONAL
CIK 1465872Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wong Tan & Molly LimFirst linked May 2018 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in a filing · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Jun 2012 · Named in a filing · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Jun 2009 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Porter & HedgesFirst linked Jun 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 108 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked May 2019 · Text search only · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Watson Farley & WilliamsFirst linked Aug 2016 · Text search only · 93 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jun 2016 · Text search only · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Reeder & SimpsonFirst linked Jul 2011 · Text search only · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2011 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wong Tan & Molly Lim | May 2018 | Named in a filing | 11 | 2.24 | 0.00 | 0.61 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Jun 2016 | Named in a filing | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Feb 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Jun 2012 | Named in a filing | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
| Maples and Calder | Jun 2009 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Porter & Hedges | Jun 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 108 | 1.13 | 0.36 | 1.44 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | May 2019 | Text search only | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| Watson Farley & Williams | Aug 2016 | Text search only | 93 | 0.59 | 0.32 | 1.37 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jun 2016 | Text search only | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Reeder & Simpson | Jul 2011 | Text search only | 47 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 1.49 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jul 2011 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Frank R. AdamsWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.75× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Joshua P. AgronsFulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Jun 2012 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 5.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 4.01×
- Tim B. SchreudersFirst linked Jul 2011 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 4.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Bryan K. BrownPorter & HedgesFirst linked Jun 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Paul E. DenaroMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Jun 2016 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Dennis J. ReederReeder & SimpsonFirst linked Jul 2011 · Text search only · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frank R. AdamsWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Feb 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 1.75 | 1.41 | 1.00 |
| Joshua P. AgronsFulbright & Jaworski | Jun 2012 | Named in a filing | 5 | 5.50 | 0.00 | 4.01 |
| Tim B. Schreuders | Jul 2011 | Named in a filing | 5 | 4.14 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Bryan K. BrownPorter & Hedges | Jun 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 2.34 | 0.00 | 1.38 |
| Paul E. DenaroMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Jun 2016 | Text search only | 10 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Dennis J. ReederReeder & Simpson | Jul 2011 | Text search only | 30 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 1.74 |