Chemspec International Ltd CPC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1463398Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in a filing · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked May 2009 · Named in a filing · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked May 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,397 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked May 2011 · Text search only · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Patterson Belknap Webb & TylerFirst linked Jun 2009 · Text search only · 185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.51× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- King & WoodFirst linked May 2009 · Text search only · 172 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shearman & Sterling | Jan 2011 | Named in a filing | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Maples and Calder | May 2009 | Named in a filing | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | May 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,397 | 1.27 | 0.11 | 0.88 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | May 2011 | Text search only | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.14 |
| Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler | Jun 2009 | Text search only | 185 | 0.89 | 0.51 | 1.13 |
| King & Wood | May 2009 | Text search only | 172 | 1.23 | 0.34 | 1.23 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gregory D. PuffAkin GumpFirst linked May 2011 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Chris LinSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Mar 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.55× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gregory D. PuffAkin Gump | May 2011 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Chris LinSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Mar 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 1.27 | 1.55 | 1.59 |