Unity Biotechnology, Inc. UBX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1463361Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began May 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Sep 2018 to Jul 2025
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Dec 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Mar 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Mar 2018 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Mar 2018 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2018 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Mar 2018 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haynes and Boone | Dec 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| Davis Polk | Mar 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Proskauer Rose | Mar 2018 | Text search only | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
| Morgan Lewis | Mar 2018 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Mar 2018 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Mar 2018 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Rick A. WernerHaynes and BooneFirst linked Dec 2023 · Named in a filing · 64 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Erica D. KassmanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.41×
- Miles P. JenningsLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.01×
- Alan F. DenenbergDavis PolkFirst linked Apr 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 114 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Brian J. CuneoLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 71 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.81×
- Mark V. RoederLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Alla DigilovaHaynes and BooneFirst linked Dec 2023 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.41×
- Ori SolomonProskauer RoseFirst linked Mar 2018 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rick A. WernerHaynes and Boone | Dec 2023 | Named in a filing | 64 | 0.44 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| Erica D. KassmanLatham & Watkins LLP | Oct 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 3.16 | 0.00 | 2.41 |
| Miles P. JenningsLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.40 | 0.00 | 2.01 |
| Alan F. DenenbergDavis Polk | Apr 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 114 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 1.46 |
| Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 95 | 0.60 | 0.19 | 1.35 |
| Brian J. CuneoLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 71 | 0.54 | 0.00 | 1.81 |
| Mark V. RoederLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.32 |
| Alla DigilovaHaynes and Boone | Dec 2023 | Text search only | 36 | 1.06 | 0.00 | 0.41 |
| Ori SolomonProskauer Rose | Mar 2018 | Text search only | 20 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 1.31 |