Zendesk, Inc. ZEN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1463172Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Fried FrankFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in a filing · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Hogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Sep 2022 · Text search only · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Mar 2022 · Text search only · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Dec 2021 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Mar 2015 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Allen & GledhillFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 64 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Gunderson DettmerFirst linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 333 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Shartsis Friese LLPFirst linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fried Frank | Nov 2022 | Named in a filing | 540 | 1.33 | 0.24 | 0.94 |
| Hogan Lovells US LLP | Dec 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 487 | 0.96 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| Cooley LLP | Feb 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Goodwin Procter | Feb 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Sep 2022 | Text search only | 305 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 0.95 |
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Mar 2022 | Text search only | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 0.99 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Dec 2021 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Proskauer Rose | Mar 2015 | Text search only | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
| Allen & Gledhill | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 64 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
| Gunderson Dettmer | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 333 | 1.17 | 0.66 | 1.32 |
| Shartsis Friese LLP | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 52 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 1.62 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian ManginoFried FrankFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Christopher R. MooreHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Keith FlaumHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Tiffany PosilHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Jesse NevarezGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.29×
- Andrew T. HillWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.56×
- Anthony J. McCuskerGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 1.08× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Bradley C. WeberGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.87× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.04×
- David PeinsippCooley LLPFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- Eric C. JensenCooley LLPFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in a filing · 66 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- William J. SchnoorGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Richard M. BrandCadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Sep 2022 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.12× · Went dark 2.09× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- John V. BautistaOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.45× · Went dark 5.07× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian ManginoFried Frank | Nov 2022 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Christopher R. MooreHogan Lovells US LLP | Dec 2021 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.22 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Keith FlaumHogan Lovells US LLP | Dec 2021 | Named in a filing | 16 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Tiffany PosilHogan Lovells US LLP | Dec 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Jesse NevarezGoodwin Procter | Feb 2021 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.29 |
| Andrew T. HillWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Feb 2016 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 2.56 |
| Anthony J. McCuskerGoodwin Procter | Feb 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 1.19 | 1.08 | 0.75 |
| Bradley C. WeberGoodwin Procter | Feb 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 1.87 | 0.00 | 3.04 |
| David PeinsippCooley LLP | Feb 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 86 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 1.55 |
| Eric C. JensenCooley LLP | Feb 2014 | Named in a filing | 66 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| William J. SchnoorGoodwin Procter | Feb 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 1.14 |
| Richard M. BrandCadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Sep 2022 | Text search only | 25 | 2.12 | 2.09 | 1.14 |
| John V. BautistaOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 13 | 0.45 | 5.07 | 1.40 |