Enphase Energy, Inc. ENPH (last ticker on record)
CIK 1463101Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Sep 2014 to May 2017
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Arnold & PorterFirst linked Dec 2018 · Named in a filing · 254 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Bingham McCutchenFirst linked Jul 2011 · Text search only · 291 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arnold & Porter | Dec 2018 | Named in a filing | 254 | 1.03 | 0.11 | 0.84 |
| Cooley LLP | Jun 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Davis Polk | Jun 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Bingham McCutchen | Jul 2011 | Text search only | 291 | 0.94 | 0.38 | 1.06 |
| Fenwick & West LLP | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael PenneyArnold & PorterFirst linked Aug 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- Brett D. WhiteCooley LLPFirst linked May 2014 · Named in a filing · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.27× · Went dark 0.84× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Marina RemennikCooley LLPFirst linked Jul 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 2.49× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- John H. SellersCooley LLPFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael PenneyArnold & Porter | Aug 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.62 |
| Brett D. WhiteCooley LLP | May 2014 | Named in a filing | 55 | 0.27 | 0.84 | 0.97 |
| Marina RemennikCooley LLP | Jul 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.47 | 2.49 | 1.03 |
| John H. SellersCooley LLP | Jun 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 1.82 |