Tri-Tech Holding, Inc.
CIK 1460801Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Jul 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Beijing Kang Da Law FirmFirst linked Apr 2009 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Kaufman & Canoles, P.C.First linked Apr 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Jul 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 305 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 0.95 |
| Beijing Kang Da Law Firm | Apr 2009 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.31 |
| Kaufman & Canoles, P.C. | Apr 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 69 | 0.92 | 0.65 | 1.46 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Zachary B. RingKaufman & Canoles, P.C.First linked Jul 2009 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- Anthony W. BaschKaufman & Canoles, P.C.First linked Apr 2009 · Named in a filing · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.45× · Went dark 0.46× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Bradley A. HanebergKaufman & Canoles, P.C.First linked Apr 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.37× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zachary B. RingKaufman & Canoles, P.C. | Jul 2009 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.55 |
| Anthony W. BaschKaufman & Canoles, P.C. | Apr 2009 | Named in a filing | 54 | 0.45 | 0.46 | 1.25 |
| Bradley A. HanebergKaufman & Canoles, P.C. | Apr 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 0.37 | 0.69 | 1.19 |