MINDBODY, Inc. MB (last ticker on record)
CIK 1458962Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked Mar 2015 · Text search only · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2015 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Mar 2015 · Text search only · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Lowenstein SandlerFirst linked Mar 2015 · Text search only · 297 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Fenwick & West LLP | Mar 2015 | Text search only | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
| Goodwin Procter | Mar 2015 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| King & Spalding | Mar 2015 | Text search only | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| Lowenstein Sandler | Mar 2015 | Text search only | 297 | 1.12 | 0.70 | 1.42 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew S. WilliamsonCooley LLPFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- Charles S. KimCooley LLPFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 118 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- David PeinsippCooley LLPFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- Jon C. AvinaCooley LLPFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew S. WilliamsonCooley LLP | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 1.70 |
| Charles S. KimCooley LLP | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 118 | 0.41 | 0.00 | 1.37 |
| David PeinsippCooley LLP | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 86 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 1.55 |
| Jon C. AvinaCooley LLP | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 42 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 1.09 |