Changyou.com Ltd CYOU (last ticker on record)
CIK 1458696Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Feb 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Commerce & Finance Law OfficesFirst linked Mar 2009 · Named in a filing · 157 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Goulston & StorrsFirst linked Mar 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Feb 2020 · Text search only · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked Mar 2009 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Mar 2009 · Text search only · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- King & WoodFirst linked Mar 2009 · Text search only · 172 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Feb 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.82 |
| Commerce & Finance Law Offices | Mar 2009 | Named in a filing | 157 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.98 |
| Goulston & Storrs | Mar 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 86 | 0.90 | 0.34 | 1.29 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Feb 2020 | Text search only | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.14 |
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | Mar 2009 | Text search only | 199 | 0.81 | 0.16 | 0.84 |
| Davis Polk | Mar 2009 | Text search only | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| King & Wood | Mar 2009 | Text search only | 172 | 1.23 | 0.34 | 1.23 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Peter X. HuangSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Feb 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.15×
- Timothy B. BancroftGoulston & StorrsFirst linked Mar 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 1.90× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter X. HuangSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Feb 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 51 | 0.26 | 0.00 | 0.15 |
| Timothy B. BancroftGoulston & Storrs | Mar 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.91 | 1.90 | 0.64 |