TPI COMPOSITES, INC TPICQ (last ticker on record)
CIK 1455684Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Aug 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Feb 2021 to Aug 2025
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Mar 2026 · Named in a filing · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Feb 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jun 2016 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Goulston & StorrsFirst linked Jun 2016 · Text search only · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLPFirst linked Jun 2016 · Text search only · 97 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Taylor WessingFirst linked Jun 2016 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 1.72× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Apr 2016 · Text search only · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Feb 2015 · Text search only · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Feb 2015 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Feb 2015 · Text search only · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Feb 2015 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Mar 2026 | Named in a filing | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Feb 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Goodwin Procter | Feb 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| DLA Piper | Jun 2016 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Goulston & Storrs | Jun 2016 | Text search only | 86 | 0.90 | 0.34 | 1.33 |
| Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP | Jun 2016 | Text search only | 97 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| Taylor Wessing | Jun 2016 | Text search only | 36 | 0.60 | 1.72 | 1.10 |
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Apr 2016 | Text search only | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 0.99 |
| Akin Gump | Feb 2015 | Text search only | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Morgan Lewis | Feb 2015 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Feb 2015 | Text search only | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Feb 2015 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kim de GlossopGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.22×
- Jesse NevarezGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.29×
- Bradley C. WeberGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.87× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.04×
- H. David HenkenGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.29×
- Ryan SansomCooley LLPFirst linked Feb 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Sandra L. FlowCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Feb 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim de GlossopGoodwin Procter | Mar 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.22 |
| Jesse NevarezGoodwin Procter | Jun 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.29 |
| Bradley C. WeberGoodwin Procter | Feb 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 1.87 | 0.00 | 3.04 |
| H. David HenkenGoodwin Procter | Feb 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 2.29 |
| Ryan SansomCooley LLP | Feb 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.93 |
| Sandra L. FlowCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Feb 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 2.66 | 0.00 | 1.65 |