RVUE HOLDINGS, INC. RVUE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1455206Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Oct 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jun 2010 to Mar 2016
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked May 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Sichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in a filing · 1,005 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Dean Law Corp.First linked Mar 2009 · Named in a filing · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.39× · Went dark 2.16× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Akerman LLPFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | May 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Mar 2011 | Named in a filing | 1,005 | 1.27 | 1.62 | 1.26 |
| Dean Law Corp. | Mar 2009 | Named in a filing | 46 | 1.39 | 2.16 | 1.21 |
| Akerman LLP | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 211 | 1.09 | 0.67 | 1.36 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Benjamin S. ReichelEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 48 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 1.69×
- Harvey J. KesnerSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- Christina C. RussoAkerman LLPFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Michael FrancisAkerman LLPFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.58×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benjamin S. ReichelEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Mar 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 48 | 1.34 | 0.37 | 1.69 |
| Harvey J. KesnerSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Jan 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 67 | 1.02 | 0.90 | 1.50 |
| Christina C. RussoAkerman LLP | Dec 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 1.70 | 0.00 | 1.42 |
| Michael FrancisAkerman LLP | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.06 | 0.00 | 1.58 |