Auspex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ASPX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1454189Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jan 2015 · Named in a filing · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Hyman Phelps & McNamaraFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLPFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 98 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Dechert LLPFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 434 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Jan 2015 | Named in a filing | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Cooley LLP | Nov 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| DLA Piper | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Hyman Phelps & McNamara | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 105 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 1.08 |
| Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 98 | 0.65 | 0.85 | 1.34 |
| Dechert LLP | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 434 | 0.84 | 0.41 | 0.96 |
| HALE AND DORR | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lisa R. HaddadGoodwin ProcterFirst linked May 2015 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.28×
- Stuart M. CableGoodwin ProcterFirst linked May 2015 · Named in a filing · 59 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Barbara L. BordenCooley LLPFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in a filing · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 0.32×
- James PenningtonCooley LLPFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Frederick T. MutoCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Kenneth J. RollinsCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Michael E. SullivanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Arthur R. McGivernGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jan 2015 · Text search only · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Cheston J. LarsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.33× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa R. HaddadGoodwin Procter | May 2015 | Named in a filing | 22 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.28 |
| Stuart M. CableGoodwin Procter | May 2015 | Named in a filing | 59 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| Barbara L. BordenCooley LLP | Apr 2015 | Named in a filing | 50 | 0.89 | 0.31 | 0.32 |
| James PenningtonCooley LLP | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Frederick T. MutoCooley LLP | Nov 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 46 | 0.95 | 1.03 | 1.13 |
| Kenneth J. RollinsCooley LLP | Nov 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| Michael E. SullivanLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 0.56 | 0.00 | 0.79 |
| Arthur R. McGivernGoodwin Procter | Jan 2015 | Text search only | 32 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.24 |
| Cheston J. LarsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 46 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 1.55 |