Medidata Solutions, Inc. MDSO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1453814Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Norton RoseFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in a filing · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Jan 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked May 2009 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked May 2009 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked May 2009 · Text search only · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLPFirst linked Mar 2009 · Text search only · 97 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 1.08× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norton Rose | Jun 2016 | Named in a filing | 304 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.24 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Jan 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
| Cooley LLP | May 2009 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Goodwin Procter | May 2009 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | May 2009 | Text search only | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP | Mar 2009 | Text search only | 97 | 0.86 | 1.08 | 0.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- PAUL JACOBSFulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Jan 2009 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 2.22×
- Warren J. NimetzFulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Jan 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Mara H. RogersFulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Mar 2009 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAUL JACOBSFulbright & Jaworski | Jan 2009 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.14 | 1.06 | 2.22 |
| Warren J. NimetzFulbright & Jaworski | Jan 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 2.67 | 0.00 | 1.24 |
| Mara H. RogersFulbright & Jaworski | Mar 2009 | Text search only | 8 | 0.97 | 0.00 | 1.92 |