Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc. XTNT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1453593Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Dec 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Mar 2016 to Aug 2026
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Fox Rothschild LLPFirst linked May 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Hogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Dec 2015 · Named in a filing · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Apr 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Sep 2016 · Text search only · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Akerman LLPFirst linked Dec 2010 · Text search only · 211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fox Rothschild LLP | May 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 149 | 0.92 | 1.38 | 0.90 |
| Hogan Lovells US LLP | Dec 2015 | Named in a filing | 487 | 0.96 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Apr 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Ballard Spahr | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Apr 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Sep 2016 | Text search only | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Akerman LLP | Dec 2010 | Text search only | 211 | 1.09 | 0.67 | 1.36 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Emily HumbertFox Rothschild LLPFirst linked Sep 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 5.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Amy E. CulbertOppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLPFirst linked May 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Thomas A. LetscherOppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLPFirst linked May 2018 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.29× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- James R. TanenbaumMorrison & FoersterFirst linked May 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 1.54× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Brian H. BlaneyGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Derek J. MirzaGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.16× · Went dark 4.95× · 95% wipeout 2.59×
- Spencer G. FeldmanOlshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Apr 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 70 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.25× · Went dark 1.65× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Sep 2016 · Text search only · 391 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.93× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emily HumbertFox Rothschild LLP | Sep 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 5.91 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| Amy E. CulbertOppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLP | May 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.84 |
| Thomas A. LetscherOppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLP | May 2018 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.00 | 1.29 | 0.94 |
| James R. TanenbaumMorrison & Foerster | May 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 46 | 1.41 | 1.54 | 1.14 |
| Brian H. BlaneyGreenberg Traurig | Sep 2010 | Named in a filing | 29 | 1.09 | 1.03 | 1.32 |
| Derek J. MirzaGreenberg Traurig | Sep 2010 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.16 | 4.95 | 2.59 |
| Spencer G. FeldmanOlshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Apr 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 70 | 2.25 | 1.65 | 1.59 |
| Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLP | Sep 2016 | Text search only | 391 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 1.21 |